Employee names now read "Winkler, Hannah" wherever a person appears in a
list, a table, a heading or a tree node. That is the order a personnel
list is kept in, it is the order people are looked up in, and it finally
matches the sorting — the employee list has always been ordered by
surname, which made an alphabetical page look unsorted.
The name was being assembled inline in about twenty places. A rename
that catches half of them is worse than none, so it now goes through
fmtName in lib/format.ts and every display site calls it.
Sentences keep the natural order: "Hannah Winkler wurde versetzt" reads
like German, "Winkler, Hannah wurde versetzt" reads like a form. So the
toasts are unchanged and only labels moved.
Two things the change would have quietly broken:
The org chart's own filter matched against "first last". It now matches
either order, with or without the comma, so typing what you see works
and so does typing what you remember.
The print model sorted by the last word of the composed name, which
happened to be the surname and is now the first name — every printed
unit would have come out sorted by first name. It sorts on the surname
field itself now, which is what it meant all along.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Opening the org chart PDF preview locked up the browser tab. The
measurement that fits each sheet to the page fed itself: the effect
listed onFaktor in its dependencies, and onFaktor was an arrow function
created fresh on every render, so the effect re-ran after every render.
It measured, reported the scale, and the report called setState with a
newly built object every time — new object, so React saw a change,
re-rendered, and the effect ran again. Measure, render, measure, until
React gave up with "Maximum update depth exceeded".
Two changes, and the mutation test says either one closes the loop on
its own: the callback now lives in a ref so the effect depends only on
the sheet identity, and the reducer returns the previous state unchanged
when the scale has not moved. Both are worth keeping — the ref stops the
effect from re-running, the guard stops pointless renders.
This shipped broken, and the reason it shipped is in the test file now.
Every element in jsdom is zero pixels, so the measurement bailed out on
its first line and the feedback never started; nine tests covering the
selection, the page count and the hierarchy all passed against a
component that froze on contact with a real browser. The new test gives
the elements a size, and fails with the exact error a user hits.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Six divisions, each with its departments beside it, ran off the edge of
the sheet. The cause was structural, not cosmetic: every level spread
horizontally, so width multiplied with depth. Six divisions times three
departments is eighteen boxes across a landscape A4 — about two
millimetres each, if they had fitted at all, which they did not. They
overlapped and were clipped at the margin.
Now only one level spreads sideways. The divisions stand in a row and
everything below them hangs lengthwise off a vertical line, so width is
the number of divisions and nothing else. Depth costs height instead,
and on a landscape page height is what there is to spare.
What still overhangs is scaled down as a whole. The sheet in the preview
now carries the print area's exact dimensions rather than growing with
its contents, so the fit is measured against the real page: what you see
is what the printer gets. If a sheet has to shrink below 55% to fit, it
says so and points at A3, instead of quietly producing something nobody
can read.
With names switched on, each department gets its own sheet — a whole
division with every name was never going to be legible on one page — and
long name lists set in two columns so the box grows sideways rather than
pushing the scale down.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The chart on screen is an infinite canvas: you zoom in, drag around, and
look at one corner at a time. Paper has none of that. Printing the canvas
means scaling 850 people onto one sheet, which yields boxes two
millimetres wide — technically the whole company, practically nothing.
So the print view is rebuilt rather than shrunk, and it does two things
the canvas cannot.
It asks before it prints. Depth (bereiche, abteilungen, teams, or teams
with every name) and which divisions, each one selectable. Whoever needs
Produktion for a meeting gets two sheets instead of forty, and the page
count is on the button before anything reaches the printer.
And it draws the hierarchy as a hierarchy: boxes joined by connecting
lines, not a column of cards. Superior and subordinate are the entire
point of an org chart; a tidy list of the same units simply does not say
it. The lines come from borders on pseudo-elements, so the PDF keeps
them as vectors and they stay sharp when someone zooms in. Header
shading gets weaker with each level down, which survives the black-and-
white printer that most of these end up on.
Overview sheet first, then one sheet per selected division, each
carrying its own heading and headcount so page seven is still readable
on its own. A4 or A3, landscape.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
