Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
4165f3f8a1 Der Wiedereintritt war da, nur nicht erreichbar
Aus dem Gespraech vom 17.09.2026.

Der Kunde suchte den Knopf "Wiedereintritt" an einer ausgetretenen Person
und hielt ihn fuer verschwunden — "ich dachte eigentlich, das ist schon
implementiert, das war mal drin". Er war drin. Er hing nur an
employee.status, und diese Spalte haengt nach: an einer Person, deren
Austritt erfasst und inzwischen vollzogen war, stand dort weiter "Aktiv".

Das ist mein Fehler beim Statusfix. Umgestellt waren dort `isActive` und
`canEditData` — die fuenf einzelnen Abfragen in derselben Datei blieben
stehen, dazu je eine in KarenzPanel und TerminatePanel. Jetzt liest keine
mehr die Spalte; die beiden Panels bekommen den abgeleiteten Status
uebergeben, statt ihn sich selbst aus der Zeile zu holen.

Betroffen war ausser dem Wiedereintritt auch: welcher Austritts-Knopf
erscheint ("Nicht angetreten" statt "Austritt"), die Beschriftung der
Abwesenheit, die Vorbelegung der Beendigungsart und ob die Zugehoerigkeit
angezeigt wird.

Dazu: die Niederlassung ist aus dem Reiter Organisation wieder raus. Sie
stand dort als unsere Auslegung von Anforderung 8; der Kunde hat sie im
Gespraech gestrichen ("nimm's mal hier raus"). Was mit der Anforderung
gemeint war, bleibt offen.
2026-09-17 11:50:26 +02:00
b87c8ad64c Remove Supabase
Some checks failed
CI / Lint, Typen, Tests, Build (push) Failing after 5m40s
CI / Migrationen auf leerer Datenbank (push) Has been cancelled
The database moved to a container of our own; the platform is gone.
This takes out what was left of it — and, where the leftovers were load
bearing, moves rather than deletes.

Moved, not deleted:

  supabase/migrations/  -> db/migrations/      the schema's source of truth
  supabase/build-org.ts -> scripts/build-org.ts
  lib/supabase/types.ts -> lib/types.ts        52 import sites repointed

The bookkeeping needed care. It lived in `supabase_migrations.schema_migrations`,
and simply renaming the schema would have left the runner facing an empty
table: it would have called all 67 migrations pending and replayed them
against a database that is long since current. So the runner now creates
`migrationen.schema_migrations` and, once, copies the old rows across —
guarded so a second run does nothing and a fresh database skips it entirely.
Only then does migration 20260907100000 drop the old schema.

Deleted: the CLI config, the seed, the historical schema/function dumps
(nothing read them), scripts/umzug-von-supabase.sh (the move is done), and
both Supabase packages plus the CLI. Nothing in the application imported
them — the build now succeeds with no environment variables at all, which
is the proof.

Integration tests: six of them signed in through Supabase Auth and asserted
against the anon key and the service role. That model is gone, so the tests
were not portable — they are deleted. session-context and
employee-status-filter already ran on pg and are untouched; om-reporting is
ported to a direct connection because it guards a real risk (the reporting
line rule exists twice, once in SQL and once in TypeScript).

CI: the integration job started a Supabase stack. It now runs a postgres
service, applies deploy/db-init and every migration to an empty database —
that was the valuable part, and it still holds — then checks that a second
run is a no-op, which is what proves the bookkeeping works.

Docs: security-review.md audited a service-role key, a cookie adapter and
auth.users, none of which exist. Restating findings about removed components
would suggest today's system had been reviewed; it has not. It now records
what was removed and says a fresh review is due. data-model.md was already
marked obsolete and described the pre-OM schema; azure-migration.md was a
plan for a route not taken. Both deleted.

Verified: npm ci, typecheck, lint, 445 tests, build — all clean without the
packages. Integration tests skip cleanly with no database. Migration SQL and
the runner are reviewed but NOT executed: no Docker here, and the old
instance no longer resolves.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-07 10:43:22 +02:00
f85731dde5 Give exits their own checklist, next to the entry one
Some checks failed
CI / Lint, Typen, Tests, Build (push) Failing after 5m42s
CI / Integrationstests (echtes Postgres) (push) Failing after 5m35s
The offboarding list was a checkbox fieldset inside the exit panel — four
items, never sent anywhere. Nothing in terminateEmployee's payload
carried them; ticking a box there recorded exactly nothing.

It's replaced with the same kind of list the entries got: its own tab,
appearing the moment an exit is recorded, with one item per row, a
comment on each, and — unlike the fieldset — a record of who touched it
and when.

The eleven items come from the same printed sheet as the entry list.
Nine are plain checkboxes. Two are text fields under "Vermerke":
remaining vacation and the balance transferred for payout — the sheet
names "Überleitung Salden für Auszahlung" twice, once as a task to do
and once as the actual figure, and those are genuinely two different
questions, kept as two items. Where the sheet still says "GKK" rather
than today's "ÖGK", it's left as written — that's the name the process
runs under internally, not a typo.

No Show gets no list. Never having worked a single day, there's no IT
access to revoke, no GKK registration to undo, no Dienstzettel to
collect — an empty checklist there would be a label with nothing behind
it. Both the tab and the auto-creation on exit check for this
specifically, not just the "Ausgetreten" status that No Show shares with
a real exit. Rehiring the same person hides the tab again — the data
stays, since it happened, but a checklist for someone currently working
has nothing to point at.

The engine (what counts as done, how progress is computed) moved into
lib/checklist.ts so onboarding and offboarding can't drift into two
different ideas of "done" the way two independent copies eventually do;
lib/onboarding.ts and lib/offboarding.ts bind it to their own item list,
and the tab UI is a single ChecklistPanel bound the same way.

Checked against the real database: a real exit creates all eleven items
in the same transaction as the exit itself; a No Show creates none;
rehiring flips the tab off while the old answers stay queryable. One
false alarm during that check turned out to be the user's own clicks on
a real employee's onboarding list, made in the browser while trying the
earlier feature — left untouched, not test debris.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 16:25:58 +02:00
d2f4a7aab7 Ask for a residence permit only where one is needed
Employees from outside the EU, the EEA and Switzerland need a residence
permit, and HR needs to know when it expires — about eighty people in
the current data, across Türkei, Serbien and Bosnien. Two columns, the
same shape as the dismissal protection: a flag and a date that only
means anything with it. The date is optional, because an open-ended
permit has none and a mandatory field would force an invented one.

The nationality coupling deliberately stays out of the database. Putting
it there would mean keeping the country list in two places — SQL and
lib/countries.ts, where the picker needs it anyway — so an EU accession
would become a migration instead of a line in a list. Worse, correcting
somebody's nationality would fail the constraint while the old permit
was still attached, which is exactly the moment someone is fixing a
mistake. The UI decides whether the fields appear, and clears them when
the nationality moves into the free-movement area.

So the list is the load-bearing part, and it is tested: 31 entries, all
of them values the picker can actually produce, no duplicates, no third
countries. A missing nationality reads as "no permit required" — an
unanswered question is a reason to record it, not to demand papers.

The permit shows on the Stammdaten tab only for the nationalities it
applies to. A line reading "Aufenthaltstitel: Nein" under an Austrian
citizenship would look like information rather than a question that does
not arise.

Filter by it and by when it expires — the question behind that being
"whose permit runs out next quarter" — plus columns in the export.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 13:27:26 +02:00
f5ace8af2e Make the part-time arrangement a state you can report on
Last step moved the four part-time arrangements out of the absence list
and recorded the reason in the history text. That answered "what
happened" but not "who is in one right now", and the profile showed
nothing at all. So it becomes a real field: teilzeit_art, with an
optional end date.

The objection I raised then still holds — a state goes stale, because
nobody goes back to note when a Bildungsteilzeit ended. teilzeit_bis is
the answer to it: with an end date a report decides for itself what is
still running instead of trusting that someone maintained the row. Left
empty it means "open end", which is an honest thing to say.

It runs through the ordinary change machinery rather than beside it. It
sits in app_feld_karte, so it shows up in the history as a field with
before and after, and can be corrected there like any other. The
description suffix from last step is gone — writing the same thing twice
is how two versions start disagreeing.

Reporting: filter by variant, by "in one at all", and by when it ends;
group headcount by variant, where the absence of one reads "Keine"
rather than a dash, because in a report that is an answer and not a gap.
Plus columns in the export and the import.

One gap found while rehearsing, and only because the probe happened to
pick a return date in the future: a scheduled return carries its payload
through pending_org_changes, and that payload did not include the
variant. Someone would have come back on reduced hours in April with the
reason gone. The daily run now carries it too.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 13:07:41 +02:00
6681dcda77 Flag people who cannot simply be dismissed
Works council members, expectant mothers, parents on leave, registered
disabled employees, apprentices — each has its own rules that come
before a dismissal. The tool does not judge whether one is lawful, but
it must not stay quiet about it either, and looking it up on the
contract tab is exactly the step that gets skipped under time pressure.

So: a checkbox, an optional end date, and a red warning at the top of
the termination panel naming the date — or saying plainly that no end
was recorded. It shows for a no-show too; the protection runs from the
start of the contract, not the first day worked.

The date is optional on purpose. A works council mandate has a known
end, a pregnancy does not, and a mandatory field would force an invented
number. A constraint says only what cannot be: an end date without the
flag, which would be a leftover nobody could interpret.

The field goes the whole way through — hire, data change, contract
sheet, export, report criteria (as a yes/no and as a date range), and
the import. A field that exists in one screen and not the next is how
people stop trusting the numbers.

Terminating is now offered for planned entries as well, labelled "Nicht
angetreten", with No Show preselected. Without it a person who never
turned up stayed a planned entry forever, since nothing else can end
one.

One finding worth recording: tsc has been reporting success on a broken
program. A generated file under .next got corrupted when a build ran
against a live dev server, and its syntax errors suppressed semantic
checking everywhere else — two genuine type errors in this change went
unreported until I typechecked with .next excluded. The file is removed
and the ordinary typecheck is meaningful again.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 12:44:00 +02:00
0144267a59 Record people who never turned up
Someone hired who then does not start needs an exit reason of its own,
and until now the case could not be recorded at all. Terminating on the
entry date failed on chk_assignment_range: the assignment was closed
with valid_to = valid_from, and an empty interval is forbidden there.
Moving the exit to the next day would have claimed a day of employment
that never happened — headcount, tenure, every as-of report.

"No Show" is now an exit reason, and it behaves differently in three
ways.

The exit date is always the entry date, whatever the caller passed. That
is what makes "never active" true rather than asserted: a person counts
as employed when their exit date is *after* the reporting date, and here
it never is. The status derivation needed no change at all — it already
says Geplant before the entry date and Ausgetreten from it on.

The position assignment is deleted rather than closed. The post was
never filled, it goes back to being open, and nothing records a holder
who never held it.

The status column goes to Ausgetreten immediately, even for an entry
still in the future. Otherwise it would read Geplant forever — nothing
runs later to correct it.

A constraint holds the first of those regardless of the path in,
including the import: exit_reason is distinct from 'No Show' or
exit_date = entry_date. "is distinct from" rather than "<>" so an empty
reason does not evaluate to null and slip through — the same three-
valued trap that let an earlier check pass the case it was written to
stop.

The dialog locks the date field when No Show is picked and says why, so
nobody types a date that would then be silently overridden. The
offboarding checklist is hidden: nothing was ever handed out.

Rehearsed against real data — a planned entry with a 2099 date passed
in, which came back as the entry date; derived status across three
reporting dates never Aktiv; a direct write with a mismatched date
refused; and an ordinary termination unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 12:33:14 +02:00