Die Blaetter kamen aus `root.children`, also aus den unmittelbaren Kindern
der Gesellschaft. Das stimmte, solange die Bereiche dort hingen. Beim
Kunden liegt "CEO" dazwischen und ist selbst ein Bereich: die Auswahl bot
einen einzigen Eintrag an, und aus 784 Personen wurde die Uebersicht plus
ein Blatt fuer CEO.
Genommen wird jetzt jeder Bereich, unter dem kein weiterer liegt -- nach
dem Etikett und nicht nach der Stellung im Baum. Nur nach dem Etikett zu
gehen genuegte nicht: CEO kaeme als eigenes Blatt dazu und enthielte die
sechs anderen noch einmal.
Die Uebersicht haengte die gewaehlten Bereiche unmittelbar unter die
Gesellschaft und haette CEO damit stillschweigend uebersprungen. Sie
zeichnet jetzt den echten Weg von oben, beschnitten auf die Aeste mit
einem gewaehlten Bereich, und geht so tief, wie dieser Baum reicht. Das
Ab- und Anwaehlen wirkt weiterhin bis in die Uebersicht.
Bei der Gesellschaft entfaellt "Leitung unbesetzt": sie wird nicht
gefuehrt, sondern ist das Ganze. Ueberall sonst bleibt der Vermerk.
Employee names now read "Winkler, Hannah" wherever a person appears in a
list, a table, a heading or a tree node. That is the order a personnel
list is kept in, it is the order people are looked up in, and it finally
matches the sorting — the employee list has always been ordered by
surname, which made an alphabetical page look unsorted.
The name was being assembled inline in about twenty places. A rename
that catches half of them is worse than none, so it now goes through
fmtName in lib/format.ts and every display site calls it.
Sentences keep the natural order: "Hannah Winkler wurde versetzt" reads
like German, "Winkler, Hannah wurde versetzt" reads like a form. So the
toasts are unchanged and only labels moved.
Two things the change would have quietly broken:
The org chart's own filter matched against "first last". It now matches
either order, with or without the comma, so typing what you see works
and so does typing what you remember.
The print model sorted by the last word of the composed name, which
happened to be the surname and is now the first name — every printed
unit would have come out sorted by first name. It sorts on the surname
field itself now, which is what it meant all along.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The chart on screen is an infinite canvas: you zoom in, drag around, and
look at one corner at a time. Paper has none of that. Printing the canvas
means scaling 850 people onto one sheet, which yields boxes two
millimetres wide — technically the whole company, practically nothing.
So the print view is rebuilt rather than shrunk, and it does two things
the canvas cannot.
It asks before it prints. Depth (bereiche, abteilungen, teams, or teams
with every name) and which divisions, each one selectable. Whoever needs
Produktion for a meeting gets two sheets instead of forty, and the page
count is on the button before anything reaches the printer.
And it draws the hierarchy as a hierarchy: boxes joined by connecting
lines, not a column of cards. Superior and subordinate are the entire
point of an org chart; a tidy list of the same units simply does not say
it. The lines come from borders on pseudo-elements, so the PDF keeps
them as vectors and they stay sharp when someone zooms in. Header
shading gets weaker with each level down, which survives the black-and-
white printer that most of these end up on.
Overview sheet first, then one sheet per selected division, each
carrying its own heading and headcount so page seven is still readable
on its own. A4 or A3, landscape.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
