3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
99e4357c02 Let colleagues finish each other's drafts, one at a time
All checks were successful
CI / Lint, Typen, Tests, Build (push) Successful in 11m18s
CI / Migrationen auf leerer Datenbank (push) Successful in 10m45s
Seeing a colleague's draft turned out to be half a feature: the point of
sharing it is to finish it while they are away. So writing is allowed
now -- but never by two people at once.

A draft is a single JSONB field. Whoever saves writes the whole state,
not the changed field, so two open wizards overwrite each other
completely and the second person sees nothing wrong: their own state is
right there on screen. That is why writing stayed with the owner until
now, and a lock is what makes giving that up safe.

The lock lives in the row (locked_by, locked_at) and is enforced by the
update and delete policies, not by the application. It expires, and that
is the important half: releasing happens when the wizard closes, and a
closed laptop never closes a wizard. Without expiry one crashed tab
would take a draft away for good -- worse than the problem being solved.
The wizard refreshes its lock while open so a long form does not lose it
mid-way.

Delete had to widen too, which reads like more than was asked for: the
wizard deletes the draft once the person is hired. Without it the hire
would go through and the draft would sit there forever. The card still
only offers delete on your own drafts.

Four of five mutations against the lock go red. The fifth -- dropping
`!open` from the refresh guard -- does not, because freigeben() already
nulls the ref the interval checks. The condition stays as the readable
statement of intent, now with a comment saying so.

Not run against a live database here; the CI migration job is the first
real execution.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-10 17:43:43 +02:00
2838919e42 @
All checks were successful
CI / Lint, Typen, Tests, Build (push) Successful in 11m12s
CI / Migrationen auf leerer Datenbank (push) Successful in 10m6s
Name every draft, and put Vertrag before Angehoerige

Two things the dashboard and the hire wizard were getting wrong.

The drafts card named the author only on other people's drafts. With
foreign and own rows side by side that reads as an inconsistency, not as
information: the eye has to work out that a missing name means "mine".
Now every row says it, "von mir" on the own ones -- the same wording the
notes in the bell already use.

In the wizard, Angehoerige stood before Vertrag. What a contract is made
of -- entry date, working days, a fixed term -- is on paper before the
conversation happens; relatives the person brings along, often on the
first day. The optional step came before the one the hire rests on.

Swapping them meant touching the part that would have broken silently:
the per-step validation was a positional list that had to line up with
STEP_LABELS by hand. Reordered labels alone would have left the checks
where they were -- "Weiter" on Vertrag would have validated the
relatives and waved an empty entry date through, until the database
refused it at the end. The checks are keyed by step name now, so they
travel with the step.

Drafts saved before this land on the step number they stored, which now
points at a different page. Nothing is lost -- the payload carries every
field -- but somebody resuming an older draft may open on Vertrag where
they left Angehoerige.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@
2026-09-10 16:35:20 +02:00
eeaf210e78 Let the same choice open notes and drafts
All checks were successful
CI / Lint, Typen, Tests, Build (push) Successful in 11m47s
CI / Migrationen auf leerer Datenbank (push) Successful in 10m10s
The picker in the bell now governs both lists, so note_subscriptions is
renamed to colleague_subscriptions -- a name that only mentions notes would
mislead the next reader.

Reading and writing a draft now reach differently far. hire_drafts_owner
(for all) is split into four policies: select lets in your own drafts and
those of the people you added, while insert/update/delete stay with the
owner. A draft is unfinished work with no lock and no history; two people
writing into the same row would overwrite each other silently.

That split forces a change in the actions: a policy does not reject a write,
it lets it hit no rows. saveHireDraft and deleteHireDraft now read the row
count instead of reporting success over a row that never changed.

The card shows a foreign draft with its author and without Fortsetzen or
Loeschen -- offering a button that reliably ends in a database error is a
promise without cover.

check-schema-types.mjs learns `alter table ... rename to`; without it the
drift check reports one rename as two errors.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-10 16:05:40 +02:00