Let the export select on everything the data model holds
The export offered four criteria — unit, location, status, employment type — while the employee record carries around twenty selectable attributes. Anything else had to be filtered by hand in Excel afterwards, which is how a payroll hand-off stops matching the application it came from. All of them are now filters: contract type, blue/white collar, collective agreement, paygrade, internal/external, gender, company car and its drivetrain, works council, lateral leadership, C-level, type of long-term absence, weekday worked, dependents on file, and open ranges for entry, exit, birth date and weekly hours. The unit filter covers every level rather than only divisions, so a single department can be selected without going the long way round. They live in one table in lib/report-criteria.ts, which the filter panel builds itself from, the parser validates against, and the query turns into conditions. A new criterion is one entry there and nothing else — and it cannot end up working in the report while being silently ignored by the export. The two export links and the saved-report config now carry the query string through as it stands instead of listing the parameters they know about. That enumeration was the actual defect: adding a filter meant remembering three separate places, and forgetting one produced an export that quietly disagreed with the figure on screen. Validation is not housekeeping here. These values reach SQL comparisons and the download filename, i.e. a Content-Disposition header; what is not in the list does not get through. The company car dropdown leaves the employee list. It is one of twenty equals under Berichte now, where the selection can also be exported — which was the point of asking in the first place. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -104,22 +104,12 @@ export function EmployeeFilters({ units, depthOf, locations }: EmployeeFiltersPr
|
||||
</option>
|
||||
))}
|
||||
</select>
|
||||
{/* „Wer hat einen Dienstwagen" ist eine wiederkehrende Frage — als
|
||||
Filter beantwortet sie sich mit einem Klick, statt über einen
|
||||
Export mit Nachbearbeitung. E-KFZ getrennt, weil das die Frage
|
||||
hinter der Frage ist. */}
|
||||
<select
|
||||
aria-label="Nach Dienstwagen filtern"
|
||||
defaultValue={searchParams.get("dienstwagen") ?? ""}
|
||||
onChange={(e) => updateParam("dienstwagen", e.target.value)}
|
||||
className={FILTER_SELECT_CLASS}
|
||||
>
|
||||
<option value="">Dienstwagen: alle</option>
|
||||
<option value="ja">Mit Dienstwagen</option>
|
||||
<option value="elektro">Nur E-KFZ</option>
|
||||
<option value="verbrenner">Nur Verbrenner</option>
|
||||
<option value="nein">Ohne Dienstwagen</option>
|
||||
</select>
|
||||
{/* Der Dienstwagen stand hier einmal als eigenes Auswahlfeld. Er ist
|
||||
jetzt eines von rund zwanzig Kriterien unter Berichte, zusammen mit
|
||||
Vertragsart, Kollektivvertrag, Eintrittszeitraum und dem Rest —
|
||||
dort lässt sich die Auswahl auch exportieren, was der eigentliche
|
||||
Zweck der Frage war. In dieser Leiste, die vor allem zum Suchen da
|
||||
ist, wäre er ein Sonderfall unter vielen gleichrangigen. */}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user